Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 07:21
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Here are all the former F1 drivers on the 2025 Le Mans 24 Hours Hypercar grid - Motorsport.com
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What was your embarrassing moment in front of your father-in-law as an Indian daughter-in-law?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Shelved Europa Lander mission concept could be used to explore Enceladus instead - Phys.org
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What should a young woman do to control sagging breasts?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How did Trump's ear recover 100% from the "two centimeter wound" we were told of two weeks ago?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.